Bonner confirms LIVE the lifting of the ban that hits Uber and 99 hard; check out!

According to the presenter of Jornal Nacional, the Uber and 99 apps will need to deal with a new ban. Understand.

The use of transport apps, such as Uber and 99, has transformed urban mobility, offering convenience and efficiency to move around cities. However, comfort during travel becomes a challenge amid high temperatures.

Air conditioning in vehicles is not a matter of luxury, but a necessity to ensure pleasant and safe journeys for both passengers and drivers.

Even so, companies like Uber and 99 often allow drivers to charge additional fees for using air conditioning. The conflict between drivers and customers has come to an end. Understand.

Bonner reports restriction on Uber and 99 – Pixels

Rio de Janeiro prohibits charging additional fees

The companies behind these apps, aware of the importance of thermal comfort, encourage drivers to keep the air conditioning on, especially during the hotter months.

However, the decision whether or not to charge an additional fee for this service varies and may depend on company policy or local law.

In short, using transport apps in hot cities puts thermal comfort at the center of the travel experience.

As passengers seek relief from the heat, drivers face the challenge of balancing costs and customer satisfaction, highlighting the importance of policies and practices that support the quality and accessibility of modern urban transport.

Rio de Janeiro takes action against air conditioning fees in Uber and 99

According to Jornal Nacional, the state of Rio de Janeiro enacted a law that prohibits charging additional fees for the use of air conditioning in vehicles operated by transport apps.

The measure aims to protect consumers from practices considered abusive, ensuring comfort and fair fares on urban travel.

A look at the decision

The new regulation places Rio de Janeiro at the forefront of defending the rights of users of transport applications, such as Uber and 99.

With the characteristic tropical climate, the use of air conditioning is not a luxury but a necessity to ensure comfortable travel, especially during the scorching summer.

Impact for passengers and drivers

For passengers, this measure ensures that thermal comfort will not be an extra cost, promoting a more pleasant travel experience without surprises in the final bill.

For drivers, although it represents the impossibility of charging additionally for a frequently requested service, the law seeks fair and transparent compensation in base rates, valuing the provision of qualified service.

Reactions and expectations

The ban sparked debates among consumers, drivers and app companies.

While some applaud the initiative, highlighting its importance for protecting consumer rights, others question possible impacts on drivers’ autonomy and service pricing dynamics.

The expectation is that the measure will encourage fairer practices in the sector, promoting a balance between quality of service and adequate remuneration.

Can the measure be extended to other states?

It is worth noting that the prohibition of additional charges by companies such as Uber and 99 is restricted to Rio de Janeiro. After all, this is a change in state legislation.

It is necessary to check local laws to know what to do in situations where the customer is charged for using the air conditioning.

The Consumer Protection Code (CDC) has national coverage, but there are different interpretations of the document.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post